Plymouth Township grant application riddled with errors

Mar. 3, 2014  PLYMOUTH EAGLE.


An application for state funding submitted by Plymouth Township in January was riddled with falsehoods and erroneous information.

Richard Reaume with Plymouth Township Treasurer Ron Edwards
Richard Reaume with Plymouth Township Treasurer Ron Edwards

The application for Economic Vitality Incentive Program (EVIP) funding is administered through the Michigan Department of Treasury and awards funding based on fulfillment of three criteria-Accountability and Transparency, Consolidation of Services and Employee Compensation.

According to the certification required by the state, any applicant applying for Consolidation of Services payment must, among other criteria, make the plan available for public viewing in the clerk’s office on posted on a publicly accessible Internet site. The township application can be found at and highlighted the Plymouth Area Recreation Complex (PARC) as a new program under the Consolidation of Services category. According to township records, officials notified the PARC committee on Nov. 27, 2013 that the municipality would not be participating in the feasibility study or the project, contrary to the filing.

After the second visit of PARC representatives to a township trustees meeting Jan. 14, the Nov. 27 decision was confirmed by 5-2 vote of the members of the board. Township Treasurer Ron Edwards spoke heatedly following the request of PARC representatives to join in a feasibility study and reiterated his determination not to participate in the project. Township Clerk Nancy Conzelman also voiced strong objections to the PARC plan. The board members also banned any participation in any joint authority with the City of Plymouth by a 4-3 vote at that meeting. Such an authority is crucial to the funding necessary for the PARC project, according to organizers. The Plymouth Township ban is effective until the end of the current terms of elected office in 2016.

The application for state funding was not due until Feb. 1, 2014, but was filed Jan. 2, “2013,” a date the state has called “a typographical error.” The application states, “Plymouth Arts Recreation Complex-a collaboration of the city, township and school district to repurpose a middle school into a community arts and recreation facility.”

The application lists the start date of the PARC project as October of 2013 and projects a 2015 completion date. Following the November notification of non-participation, some board members were admonished for using their official elected titles on informational materials about the PARC project, according to one township trustee.

The application also cites savings achieved by eliminating the “Township Parks and Recreation Director.” Records show there was no parks and recreation director in the township in 2013.

Township records indicate that the board of trustees approved a budget line item of $100,000 in December to create a new recreation department.

The application states that the Plymouth Community Fire Department provides shared services to the City of Plymouth and Plymouth Township when in fact that joint service agreement has not been in effect for more than two years. The City of Plymouth application for the same program does not include any mention of these shared services. In addition, the township application states that the township is “Reviewing and analyzing the option for a three-community local joint fire department including the City of Plymouth, the City of Northville and Plymouth Township” citing a $400,000 estimated annual savings and estimating an implementation of January, 2015. The ban on joint authority agreements with the City of Plymouth approved Jan. 14 would prevent such an arrangement.   The application for the same state funding from the City of Plymouth makes no mention of any such combined fire department.

According to the Department of Treasury documents, “Any local unit that falsifies certification documents shall forfeit any future economic vitality incentive program payments and shall repay the state all economic vitality incentive program payments it has received.”

That apparently will not be the case in Plymouth, however, as a state spokesperson said that he was unsure if the penalties would be imposed if the errors were corrected before the actual checks were sent to the municipality.

The application containing the misinformation was signed by Chief Administrative Officer Plymouth Township Supervisor Richard Reaume. The township received $10,584 from the program in 2013, according to township records.

|News Plymouth Michigan

Plymouth Voice

Previous post

Livonia clerk requests Northville endorsement

Next post

Central City Dance to host Disney World auditions