Township rejects middle-school-complex plan

WATCH VIDEO  – Frustrated PARC Committee member, Don Soenen, tries to reason with obstinate Plymouth Township Clerk, Nancy Conzelman


Nov. 22, 2103  PLYMOUTH EAGLE.


“We are one community.” Don Soenen, PARC Committee spokesperson.


The plan to convert the current Central Middle School property in downtown Plymouth to an entertainment and recreation complex met with strong resistance at the Plymouth Township Board of Trustees meeting last week.

Don Soenen, a member of the Plymouth Arts and Recreation Complex committee (PARC), went to the township meeting to ask for the “support” of the township for the project. Soenen provided each of the Plymouth Township board members an elementary site plan of the proposed project. He asked the board members, “What would the township like to see in this project. We all need to have some input.”

Soenen reiterated plans first announced at a public meeting hosted by PARC two weeks ago. He said that the plan met with considerable public support and estimated the price at about $25 million, including $2.5 million for the purchase of the land from the Plymouth-Canton Community School District.

Soenen told the board members that the project would entail 24 months of planning, possibly leading to a 2015 ballot proposal for a property tax to support the facility.

Nancy Conzelman-Plymouth Township ClerkTownship Clerk Nancy Conzelman was the first to criticize the concept Soenen presented.

“If this site was not available (Central Middle School) would you still pursue this project?” she asked. She demanded to know why a location in the township had not been considered. Soenen responded that the group could “look at any alternative proposal.”

That alternative came almost immediately from Township Treasurer Ron Edwards who announced, to the apparent surprise of the other officials, that a feasibility study regarding a new township recreation study was already in the planning stages. Edwards made the announcement while discussing the 2014 township budget. He said that he had earmarked $50,000 for “a study, a survey, to see what the residents of Plymouth Township want” in a new recreation complex.

While showing a video slide with a $50,000 entry highlighted, Edwards displayed aerial photos of a property in California, where he said a similar recreation project to the one he was proposing was successfully implemented. He praised the benefits of his idea which include a 30 acre site with baseball diamonds and football/soccer fields convertible to skating rinks. He said the project could be funded with a 2-mill tax increase on property owners.

“The average cost would be about $250 a year for each resident,” he said.

“I think we need our own facility. We’ve talked about it for years,” Edwards announced.

Trustee Bob Doroshewitz, a member of the PARC committee, expressed his surprise at the proposal and a heated discussion ensued. Doroshewitz questioned the other board members about their prior knowledge of Edwards’ plan and all claimed to have heard the plan for the first time at the meeting.

When Doroshewitz questioned Edwards’ motives for not agreeing to consider Soenen’s plan, Edwards shouted, “He wasn’t going to do it in Plymouth Township.”

Soenen, who returned to the meeting after the heated argument, said, “I’ve lived in Plymouth for 43 years and I’ve never made the distinction between Plymouth and Plymouth Township. I live in Plymouth, and it’s always been Plymouth, and it’ll always be Plymouth. I think the city and the township share a relationship and each benefits from the other.”

In a later interview, Soenen said, “I’m disappointed with the lack of support I received from the board. I’ve not had a single negative comment from any resident. This is not a city versus township thing.”

|News Plymouth Michigan

Previous post

Demolition of ‘Daisy’ wall makes way for new condominiums

Next post

Spin doctors again snub PARC committee